Skip to main content

Questionable Color-free Cheese Puffs

Call me a tree-hugging-organic-food-composting-Mom. I’m proud that my household bans artificial foodstuffs from our pantry (low these past 16 years). Riddled with guilt afterwards, I do occasionally cave to my daughter’s desire for mac and cheese in the blue box (if it’s the only choice my picky eater will agree to on a restaurant’s kid’s menu). Outside of this occasional transgression, I do my best to read packages and question ingredients that either have number designations next to color names or the word artificial in them.

It comes at no surprise that a movement is slowly building to spotlight the amount of artificial colors found in many popular foods. Many consumer advocacy organizations such as The Center for Science in the Public Interest believe that synthetic food dyes (specifically Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 60) may be linked to behavioral problems (hyperactivity) in children. This group recently asked the U.S. government to ban the dyes—or at least require manufacturers to include prominent warnings that ...“artificial colorings in this food cause hyperactivity and behavioral problems in some children.”

The FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration) came out with a report on March 31 in which they acknowledged the problem, but took no action to mandate any bans or package warnings; a procedure the European Union adopted this past July.

To try and understand the need and motivation for artificial colorings, it’s important to note why manufacturers consider their inclusion necessary.

Food and drink companies understand that color influences what a consumer will find appealing to eat and drink prior to any taste-tests. Data has proven to support this notion and the fact that consumer expectations are not easily changed. It’s hard to believe that any buyer would turn away from a popular cheese puff should the vestiges of orange-stained fingers be removed from the eating experience

While junk food is notorious for having tons of artificial dyes—foods such as margarine, salmon, and maraschino cherries have all taken a turn in coloring controversies too.

Until enough conclusive data is published to satisfy the FDA to require changes in how food is colored—consumer beware. The next time you get ready to spear a pickle or dive into the ever-popular red velvet cake, you might want to pause and consider what lies below the surface of each yummy bite.

Popular posts from this blog

Colors: What They Mean and How To Make Them

It would appear on first glance at this book’s title, that it is a “how-to” text for the hobbyist or textile artist on dye recipes. Some information is given on where pigments are derived from; how to use sources on where to find and create pigments for dying fabric. The real value of the book is not in the recipes but in the cultural history of the pigment sources and the meanings of color, all packaged in a beautifully designed book. Each thought-out chapter highlights a color and is illustrated with photos and fine art reproductions to reinforce the text. Not book for color theorists–but offers a good general survey of color and it's uses throughout the centuries. Written and (visually) presented to hold the reader's attention with interesting facts without overwhelming. Colors: What They Mean and How to Make Them by Anne Varichon

Frappuccinos Minus Bugs

The vegan community can rejoice today. Starbucks will no longer use cochineal ( koch-i-neel ) extract in their Strawberries & Crème Frappuccino® and Strawberry Banana Smoothie. Other products such Raspberry Swirl Cake, Birthday Cake Pop, Mini Doughnut with pink icing, and Red Velvet Whoopie Pie will continue to be produced with the ingredient until June of this year. The tip-off that lead to an online post (hosted by the website thisdishisvegetarian.com ) was given last month by a barista working at a midwest Starbucks. A petition was posted on change.org and PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) also joined the fray to show their support. All aforementioned parties later applauded the policy change today on their respective blogs. Fleeting as some stories are, time will be the final judge on whether this story has any lasting impression on consumers. Approved by the FDA , cochineal has a long and illustrious history . With a positive nod toward social respons...

Making a Color Exclusive

Logos, slogans, and colors, become synonymous with a product, company, cause or sports team over time. Studies to support consumer driven responses to color are constantly being monitored by the marketplace to maximize data on current and future color trends. Because color can stand independently of words, it is capable of being recognized on its own —devoid of any reinforced logo or text. With this in mind, should an organization strive to protect their color assets through trademark? Not unlike a logo or company slogan, colors can also be protected under the umbrella of trademark. But can these measures extend to the name of a color as well? Syracuse University filed a federal trademark for the exclusive rights to the word “orange”. From the university’s perspective it was a logical move toward protecting their sports team name (which in 2004 had been edited down from “Orangemen” to simply “ Orange ”). Even though the official filing was done in 2006, several colleges have ...